Anil Kumar Goel · study 4 of 5
Conviction sizing, with care
Size a bet big enough to matter but small enough that being wrong cannot ruin you - and never borrow to make it bigger.
The setup - how much to put on your best idea
Say Priya has ₹1,000 saved up, and she has found five things she wants to buy shares in. Now she must decide something that matters even more than what she buys: how much to put in each one. Should she split it evenly, ₹200 in each? Should she put ₹600 in the one she likes most and ₹100 in the rest? Or should she put the whole ₹1,000 in her single favourite? This choice - how much money to place on each idea - is called position sizing. "Position" just means how much of one share you hold.
Here is the thing most beginners miss. You can be a brilliant picker and still lose badly if you size wrongly. If Priya puts almost everything into one small company and it fails, she is hurt no matter how clever her other four picks were. And if she spreads so thin that even her best idea is a tiny sliver, then being right barely helps her. Sizing is where good picking turns into real gain - or real pain.
Anil Kumar Goel, the well-known Indian investor, was known for conviction - when his careful homework made him truly confident in an idea, he was willing to put meaningful money behind it, not just a token amount. But conviction in cyclical, small-company shares is a sharp tool. This study is about betting meaningfully on your best ideas while respecting how much a small, bumpy bet can hurt you.
The read - meaningful, but never so big it can ruin you
There are two mistakes people make with sizing, and they sit at opposite ends. One person spreads so thin that every idea is tiny, so even their best research earns them almost nothing. The other person, full of excitement, bets so heavily on one idea that a single mistake wipes them out. The wise middle is to size an idea big enough to matter, but small enough that being wrong cannot ruin you.
Why does conviction earn the right to a bigger slice? Because a slice too small does nothing. If you have done deep homework and truly understand a business, putting only 1% into it means that even if you are completely right, your whole pot barely moves. So some of your best ideas deserve a meaningful slice - that is what makes careful research worth doing.
But - and this is the heart of it - a cyclical, small-company share is not a safe place to bet the farm. It can fall hard, stay down for years, and be hard to sell. So the meaningful slice must still be a slice you could lose entirely without being ruined. The test is a calm question: "If this one goes to almost nothing, am I still okay?" If the honest answer is no, the bet is too big, however sure you feel. Conviction sets the size; the fear of ruin sets the limit. And the limit always wins.
See it happen - two ways to place ₹10 lakh
illustrative Priya and her cousin Kabir each have ₹10 lakh. Both like the same small cyclical share, an invented mill called Kavi Sugar. But they size it very differently. Then Kavi Sugar has a bad stretch and falls 60% before the cycle finally turns.
| Priya - sensible | Kabir - over-bet | |
|---|---|---|
| Money put into Kavi Sugar | ₹1.5 lakh (15%) | ₹8 lakh (80%) |
| Rest, spread across other ideas | ₹8.5 lakh | ₹2 lakh |
| When Kavi Sugar falls 60% | Loses ₹90,000 | Loses ₹4.8 lakh |
| Total pot after the fall | About ₹9.1 lakh | About ₹5.2 lakh |
| Can they calmly wait for the turn? | Yes - barely dented | Hard - nearly half gone |
Read the last row, because it is the real difference. Both were right that the cycle would eventually turn. But Kabir sized so big that the fall before the turn nearly halved his money. Now he is frightened. He may panic and sell at the bottom - the worst possible moment - just to stop the pain. His correct idea does not save him, because his size broke his nerve.
Priya put a meaningful 15% in - enough that a good outcome truly helps her - but small enough that a 60% fall only dented her by ₹90,000. She is calm. She can wait years for the cycle to turn without fear. And here is the quiet lesson: the one who can wait calmly is usually the one who collects the reward when the wave finally turns up. Sizing is not just about money; it is about protecting your own calm, so you can hold on long enough to be right.
Where this idea can trip you up
Feeling sure is not the same as being right. Conviction is a feeling, and feelings can be wrong. The more certain you feel, the more careful you should be about size, not less - because your certainty might be the very thing fooling you. Big bets should come from deep, checkable homework, never from a strong feeling or a hot tip.
Never borrow to bet bigger. The most dangerous mistake of all is using borrowed money (sometimes called leverage or margin) to make a position larger than your own savings allow. Borrowing turns a normal fall into a disaster: the lender can force you to sell at the very bottom, and you can lose more than you put in. In cyclical small caps, which already fall hard and stay down, borrowing to size up is how people are permanently ruined. The rule is plain: size with money you own, never with money you owe.
A "small" slice of an illiquid share is not as small as it looks. In a thinly traded small-cap, even a modest slice can be hard to sell when you want out. So the size you can safely hold is smaller than it seems on paper, because your escape door is narrow. Sizing must respect not just how far a share might fall, but how hard it would be to leave.
Using this in India
Goel's willingness to back his best ideas meaningfully worked alongside decades of experience, deep homework, and - importantly - money he could afford to lock away for years. An ordinary Indian reader with school fees, an EMI (a monthly loan payment), and savings they may need soon is in a very different situation. The same size that a seasoned investor holds calmly could be reckless for someone whose money is not truly spare.
This idea cannot give you a magic number for how much to put in any share. There is no formula that fits everyone. What it gives you is a way of thinking: bet meaningfully only when your homework is deep, keep every single bet small enough that losing it fully would not ruin you, and never, ever borrow to make a bet bigger. In India's small-cap world - where falls are sharp, selling is hard, and one bad monsoon or rule change can hurt - sizing smaller than your excitement suggests is almost always the wiser mistake to make.
How to spot it yourself
- Ask the ruin question first. "If this share went to almost nothing, would I still be okay?" If the answer is no, the size is too big.
- Earn the bigger slice with homework. Only let deep, checkable research raise a position's size - never a feeling, a tip, or excitement.
- Never borrow to size up. Bet only with money you own. Borrowed money turns a fall into a possible ruin.
- Use only truly spare money. Money you will need for fees, EMIs, or emergencies should never sit in a bumpy small-cap bet.
- Remember the narrow exit. In a thinly traded share, the safe size is smaller than it looks, because selling is hard.
- Size to protect your calm. Choose a size you can hold without panic through a long, scary fall - because calm holders collect the reward.
Carry forward
- Position sizing - how much money you place on each idea - matters as much as which shares you pick.
- Your best-researched ideas can earn a meaningful slice, but only one small enough that losing it fully cannot ruin you.
- In cyclical small caps, over-betting breaks your nerve, so you panic-sell at the bottom and your correct idea never pays.
- Never use borrowed money to size up, and never bet money you will actually need soon.
Size a bet big enough to matter but small enough that being wrong cannot ruin you - and never borrow to make it bigger.